Add Row
Add Element
cropper
update

[Company Name]

Agility Engineers
update
Add Element
  • Home
  • Categories
    • SAFe
    • Agile
    • DevOps
    • Product Management
    • LeSS
    • Scaling Frameworks
    • Scrum Masters
    • Product Owners
    • Developers
    • Testing
    • Agile Roles
    • Agile Testing
    • SRE
    • OKRs
    • Agile Coaching
    • OCM
    • Transformations
    • Agile Training
    • Cultural Foundations
    • Case Studies
    • Metrics That Matter
    • Agile-DevOps Synergy
    • Leadership Spotlights
    • Team Playbooks
    • Agile - vs - Traditional
Welcome To Our Blog!
Click Subscribe To Get Access To The Industries Latest Tips, Trends And Special Offers.
  • All Posts
  • Agile Training
  • SAFe
  • Agile
  • DevOps
  • Product Management
  • Agile Roles
  • Agile Testing
  • SRE
  • OKRs
  • Agile Coaching
  • OCM
  • Transformations
  • Testing
  • Developers
  • Product Owners
  • Scrum Masters
  • Scaling Frameworks
  • LeSS
  • Cultural Foundations
  • Case Studies
  • Metrics That Matter
  • Agile-DevOps Synergy
  • Leadership Spotlights
  • Team Playbooks
  • Agile - vs - Traditional
February 18.2025
3 Minutes Read

Broadcom and TSMC Eye Split of Intel’s Design and Manufacturing Assets

Intel’s Design and Manufacturing Capabilities showcased through a digital microchip with blue circuits.

A Potential Power Shift in Chip Manufacturing

The semiconductor landscape is in the midst of a profound transformation as Broadcom and TSMC eye a potential acquisition of Intel's core assets. This comes at a time when Intel is wrestling with ongoing financial struggles and underwhelming performance in a rapidly evolving tech ecosystem.

Both Broadcom, a US tech behemoth, and TSMC, Taiwan's most lucrative foundry, are reportedly considering proposals that would split Intel’s operations—separating its chip design capabilities from its manufacturing prowess. Such a split reflects the growing urgency among these companies to establish dominance in the highly competitive semiconductor field. The talks remain preliminary, but the implications for the tech industry could be monumental.

The Role of National Security in Semiconductor Deals

Any potential deal, particularly involving TSMC, will heavily factor in national security concerns, especially considering Intel's critical role in US chip supply chains. Intel's considerable receipt of funding from the US government's Chips Act raises questions about whether foreign ownership of its factories would be permissible. The Trump administration's coalition-building discussions may introduce further complications, signaling a delicate dance between technology, governance, and international collaboration.

Are We Witnessing Intel’s Decline?

Once a stalwart of the semiconductor industry, Intel’s market position has frayed in recent years. As companies like AMD and Nvidia solidify their hold on advanced chip technology, Intel has been left floundering. Following the departure of former CEO Pat Gelsinger, who failed to execute a robust turnaround plan, the board is now charged with restoring the company's competitive edge.

Despite still being a significant player—shaping products for giants like Microsoft—Intel's struggle to adapt its dual business model, which juggles both design and manufacturing, signals deeper issues. Its operational independent factories have started accepting orders from third parties, showcasing an existential pivot that could allow it to rethink its long-term strategy.

The Future of Chip Design and Manufacturing

Should Broadcom and TSMC successfully orchestrate an acquisition, the outcome could redefine the entire semiconductor landscape. Potentially, a collaborative model could emerge, where chip design—and innovation—catalyzes manufacturing through efficient resource sharing and advanced technological integration.

As Broadcom eyes the creation of a strong design arm, TSMC’s manufacturing excellence could facilitate the birth of a new paradigm, possibly accelerating advancements in AI, IoT, and cloud computing technologies. Such consolidation might pave the way for improvements in supply chain resilience—a topic increasingly pertinent in light of recent global disruptions.

Decisions Ahead for Intel’s Board

Amid these swirling discussions, Intel's board faces pressing decisions that may herald a very different future for the company. With talks of strategic splits and acquisitions on the horizon, Intel has to weigh its legacy against the reality of a rapidly changing market. On one hand, breaking itself up could unlock potential value for shareholders; however, there remains the risk of losing its identity as a cohesive entity driving tech innovation.

As they seek a new CEO, the pivotal choice to maintain control of both design and manufacturing capabilities or to embark on an uncertain path of division will significantly mold Intel's trajectory in the years to come.

A Call for Agile Innovations in Chipmaking

With the stakes so high, what can industry players and investors do in response to these developments? An embrace of Agile methodologies in manufacturing and design processes might offer the flexibility and responsiveness the semiconductor industry desperately needs. This could foster innovation, making agile chip-making a hallmark of the next generation of devices.

For those navigating the complexities of the semiconductor world—whether investors, developers, or tech enthusiasts—an understanding of these developments is crucial. Staying informed about the competitive landscape, potential partnerships, and the implications of government actions will be key in harnessing the opportunities that arise from these seismic shifts.

In conclusion, as Broadcom and TSMC explore potential paths regarding Intel’s core businesses, the impact of these developments will be felt across not just technology, but the economy at large. Engaging actively in these conversations and embracing innovative strategies may help stakeholders shape a future characterized by resilience and growth in the semiconductor sector.

Agile-DevOps Synergy

36 Views

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
11.26.2025

Why Up to 70% of SRE Initiatives Stall Before They Scale: Overcoming Challenges

Update Understanding SRE Plateauing: The Common Challenges Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) is crucial in bridging the gap between development and operations, but up to 70% of SRE initiatives stall before they can scale properly. This setback often occurs due to a mix of cultural resistance, inadequate tooling, and misalignment between teams. Organizations seek to adopt SRE principles to enhance their services, yet the path to successful implementation is fraught with obstacles. The Importance of Culture in SRE Success Culture is the foundation upon which SRE initiatives are built. Strong collaboration and open communication foster an environment where both Development and Operations teams can thrive. When teams are siloed, it leads to misunderstandings and a reluctance to share knowledge, stalling progress. For instance, a company may have the most advanced monitoring tools, but if the team isn't willing to trust and act on the data provided, those tools become useless. Tooling and Technology: Choosing the Right Solutions Another critical aspect is the selection of appropriate tools that align with the organization's SRE goals. Companies often implement tools without fully understanding how they fit into the broader DevOps and Agile framework. This can lead to an excess of complex tools that hinder productivity instead of enhancing it. Organizations must ensure that their toolsets are agile enough to adapt to changing needs and can be integrated seamlessly into existing workflows. The Alignment of Goals Across Teams Ensuring that all teams involved in an SRE initiative are aligned on objectives is essential. This alignment promotes a shared vision that drives collaborative efforts. For example, setting clear Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) ensures that everyone is moving in the same direction. When teams have measurable targets, it encourages accountability and transparency, essential elements for scaling SRE initiatives. Actionable Strategies for Overcoming the Plateaus Organizations can take specific measures to prevent SRE initiatives from stalling. First, promoting a culture of continuous improvement is vital. This can involve regular feedback sessions, training, and workshops designed to enhance collaboration. Second, teams should conduct retrospective meetings to analyze what went wrong in failed initiatives, learning valuable lessons from these experiences. Lastly, utilizing Agile methodologies can help organizations remain adaptable, allowing them to pivot as real-time data emerges. Future Trends: The Path Forward for SRE Looking ahead, the integration of SRE into Agile DevOps practices is increasingly becoming essential. As organizations strive for faster deployments and improved service delivery, SRE can provide the stability needed to support high-paced development environments. The evolution of DevSecOps, ensuring security is integrated within SRE practices, also exemplifies the growth potential in this field. By embracing these trends, companies have the opportunity to break through the plateau, pushing beyond initial implementations towards scalable, successful SRE initiatives. Understanding these elements can enlighten organizations on the importance of addressing the cultural, technological, and alignment challenges that often derail SRE efforts. By applying actionable strategies and embracing future trends, organizations can enhance their SRE practices and realize their full potential. Organizations interested in taking their SRE initiatives to new heights should focus on cultural integration, selecting the right tools, and ensuring all teams align with the overarching objectives to achieve sustainable success.

11.25.2025

How Governing AI Agents Across the SDLC Transforms DevOps Practices

Update The Coming Age of AI in Software Development Artificial intelligence (AI) is swiftly transitioning from a novelty to a necessity in software development, fundamentally altering the roles of engineers and developers. As we embrace this evolution, it's essential to recognize how human oversight plays an invaluable role within this AI-driven landscape. AI Agents and Their Impact on DevOps Workflows Emilio Salvador, vice president of strategy and developer relations for GitLab, asserts that developers must tend not only to their coding duties but also manage a small ensemble of AI agents. These agents, varying in their functions—some are personal while others are task-specific—revolutionize everyday operations. Far from a linear pipeline, the DevOps process is becoming an orchestrated system where human intention drives policy, and AI agents execute various functions including verification and compliance checks. Recognizing Bottlenecks: More than Just Code Generation While many organizations actively harness AI for code generation, it is crucial to recognize that bottlenecks often arise elsewhere in the software development lifecycle (SDLC). According to Salvador, challenges such as brittle continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD), slow security checks, and manual release processes hinder true innovation. Therefore, optimizing the SDLC across all stages—with AI playing a strategic role in functions like test generation and security scanning—becomes imperative. The Quest for Governance in AI Systems The concept of “AI guardians” emerges as a central theme in addressing potential risks associated with AI usage. These specialized agents continuously monitor security, compliance, and quality assurance while keeping humans in the loop for critical decisions and approvals. Without established governance, organizations risk fragmented models and agent sprawl, ultimately requiring a comprehensive framework to identify which agents can access and operate on specific data types. Best Practices for AI Governance Informed by discussions from various sources, including best practices from IEEE and Informatica, companies are encouraged to establish a solid AI governance framework. This encompasses defining clear policies for AI deployment, ensuring accountability, and continuously auditing agent behavior. By implementing regular assessments and monitoring mechanisms, organizations can proactively identify and counteract risks associated with AI implementations, including data privacy and compliance violations. The Future of AI-Driven Development Modernization is another key component of this AI integration. Leveraging AI to refactor legacy applications will allow organizations to accelerate their adaptation cycles, promoting faster evolution rather than merely producing more software. Success will hinge on the ability of DevOps teams to intelligently balance speed, compliance, and quality within their frameworks. Beyond Development: The Holistic Importance of AI Governance The ongoing development and refinement of AI governance is critical not only for compliance but also for ensuring that AI serves as an enabler of innovation. The financial and reputational risks of allowing AI to operate unchecked are significant, from biased outcomes to operational inefficiencies. As such, a dedicated strategy for AI governance is not merely a regulatory obligation but a strategic advantage in today’s competitive landscape. As AI continues to reshape our approach to software development, fostering an environment where innovation thrives with governance can significantly enhance overall performance. By addressing these critical areas within the AI framework, organizations can unlock the full potential of technology while ensuring ethical, reliable, and efficient use of AI. Stay informed, stay engaged, and harness the power of AI responsibly.

11.26.2025

SitusAMC Cyber Breach: A Wake-Up Call for Financial Institutions on Third-Party Risks

Update Understanding the SitusAMC Cyber Breach: Implications for Major Banks A recent cyberattack on SitusAMC, a key player in the fintech realm, has sent shockwaves through the financial services industry, particularly affecting major players like JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, and Morgan Stanley. This breach has raised significant concerns about data security and third-party vendor risks as the banking sector relies on such partnerships to manage vast amounts of customer data tied to mortgages and real estate loans. What Happened During the Breach? SitusAMC unveiled the unauthorized access on November 12, 2025, after receiving alerts about certain data welfare from various financial institutions. The company reported that attackers stole internal corporate data, including accounting records and legal agreements, which could potentially impact client stakeholders. Although the full extent of the data breach is under still review, the incident underscores the vulnerabilities that stem from the interconnected nature of financial operations. The Fallout: Who is Affected? The fallout from this incident primarily impacts major financial institutions known for their robust security systems. Although JPMorgan Chase, Citi, and Morgan Stanley have yet to confirm the specifics of the compromised data, they are actively assessing the situation. Such assessments often take time, as the institutions need to determine what customer data may have been accessed, which emphasizes the lengthy and complex investigation process they are now embroiled in. Federal Response and Cybersecurity Measures In light of the breach, federal authorities, including the FBI, have stepped up their investigations to identify those responsible. Director Kash Patel emphasized that so far, no operational impact on banking services has been reported, reinforcing that while the breach may have compromised sensitive information, those affected have not lost access to essential banking operations. Following the incident, SitusAMC has taken immediate corrective actions to bolster its systems against further threats. These include credential resets and enhanced firewall settings, although the company asserted that “no encrypting malware was involved,” indicating that the hackers were primarily focused on data extraction rather than deploying ransomware. Lessons Learned: Third-Party Vendor Risks This breach serves as a critical reminder that even the largest and most secure banks can be vulnerable due to their reliance on third-party vendors. Cybersecurity experts note that vendor-related cyber incidents are on the rise, with an alarming 15% increase year over year. As banks ramp up their own cybersecurity defenses, the weakest links are often found within the smaller firms they partner with, highlighting the need for comprehensive risk assessments and cybersecurity audits when outsourcing services. Potential Future Developments in Cybersecurity Regulations The various regulatory bodies are likely to take note of this incident, potentially leading to stricter compliance requirements for banks regarding third-party cybersecurity governance. Recent regulations, such as those from the SEC and FINRA, which emphasize the obligations of financial institutions in maintaining oversight of service providers, could see further developments in response to such breaches. Final Thoughts: Preparing for Future Threats As the investigation into the SitusAMC breach continues and institutions assess the potential fallout, stakeholders across the financial services industry must engage in critical discussions about safeguarding personal data and mitigating third-party risks. With the financial sector already experiencing an uptick in cyberattacks, this incident serves not only as a wake-up call but also as an impetus for change in how security processes are developed and maintained. In the evolving landscape of fintech and data security, it is paramount that organizations remain vigilant, prioritize transparency, and maintain regular communication with customers. By embedding cybersecurity into the fabric of their operations, banks can work toward a future where financial transactions are not only secure but also resilient against the threats that loom in an increasingly digital world.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*